History, asked by aashikaushik151, 17 days ago

Why is the periodization of Indian history done by James Mill not accepted

by historians today?​

Answers

Answered by yoliveroppa1
21

Answer:

It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.

Answered by caanusha7
1

Answer:

ɪᴛ ᴡᴀꜱ ɴᴏᴛ ᴀᴄᴄᴇᴘᴛᴇᴅ ʙʏ ɪɴᴅɪᴀɴ ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀɪᴀɴꜱ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ɪᴛ ᴅɪᴅ ɴᴏᴛ ᴘʀᴏᴠɪᴅᴇ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘʟᴇᴛᴇ ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴏɴ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴏɴᴇ. ᴊᴀᴍᴇꜱ ᴍɪʟʟ ᴅɪᴠɪᴅᴇᴅ ɪɴᴅɪᴀɴ ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀʏ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜʀᴇᴇ ᴘᴀʀᴛꜱ: ʜɪɴᴅᴜ, ᴍᴜꜱʟɪᴍ ᴀɴᴅ ʙʀɪᴛɪꜱʜ. ᴛʜɪꜱ ᴘᴇʀɪᴏᴅɪꜱᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴅᴏᴇꜱ ɴᴏᴛ ʜᴇʟᴘ ᴜꜱᴇ ᴜɴᴅᴇʀꜱᴛᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ʟɪᴠᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴍɪɴᴏʀɪᴛʏ.

Explanation:

hope my answer is helpful for you (◕ᴗ◕✿)

Similar questions