Why is the periodization of Indian history done by James Mill not accepted
by historians today?
Answers
Answered by
21
Answer:
It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.
Answered by
1
Answer:
ɪᴛ ᴡᴀꜱ ɴᴏᴛ ᴀᴄᴄᴇᴘᴛᴇᴅ ʙʏ ɪɴᴅɪᴀɴ ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀɪᴀɴꜱ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ɪᴛ ᴅɪᴅ ɴᴏᴛ ᴘʀᴏᴠɪᴅᴇ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘʟᴇᴛᴇ ᴠɪᴇᴡ ᴏɴ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴏɴᴇ. ᴊᴀᴍᴇꜱ ᴍɪʟʟ ᴅɪᴠɪᴅᴇᴅ ɪɴᴅɪᴀɴ ʜɪꜱᴛᴏʀʏ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜʀᴇᴇ ᴘᴀʀᴛꜱ: ʜɪɴᴅᴜ, ᴍᴜꜱʟɪᴍ ᴀɴᴅ ʙʀɪᴛɪꜱʜ. ᴛʜɪꜱ ᴘᴇʀɪᴏᴅɪꜱᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴅᴏᴇꜱ ɴᴏᴛ ʜᴇʟᴘ ᴜꜱᴇ ᴜɴᴅᴇʀꜱᴛᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ʟɪᴠᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴍɪɴᴏʀɪᴛʏ.
Explanation:
hope my answer is helpful for you (◕ᴗ◕✿)
Similar questions