Question

why is the process of writting more important than the end result?

​

Answer 1

The terms "learning process" and "end result" are too vague. Answers will depend on what someone guesses is meant by those.

Learning should be a path towards knowledge that can be used. It might be practical knowledge. It might be knowledge that's personally satisfying. What's important is that the time spent gets you what you wanted.

I could be wrong, but it feels like the real question is, "If I can learn well enough to pass the tests why does it matter what I do to learn the material?"

In real life, when learning for your own needs, it makes no different how you learn. The test is whether the knowledge you gathered helps you do what you wanted to do with it.

School isn't real life. As much as schools want to be about learning, they're really about pushing information into students that the students might need one day. Since schools aren't teaching anything immediately useful, they can't judge their performance by how well the students can use what's taught. They need to depend on tests. The only thing tests are certain of testing is how well someone can take the test. Someone may have a useable understanding but not be able to pass the test. Someone may be able to pass the test but not know what they're doing.

Schools are stuck with this system because they're set up to provide mass education not maximize individual learning. (Teachers may want to treat each student as an individual but the system makes it hard if not impossible to do.)

Plz mark as BRAINLIEST