why schools should reopen during covid 19 ? ,
surely I will make you the brainly but pls i would be happy and glad that u wont spam irrelevant answers , thanks you :)
Answers
Answered by
2
School closures have clear negative impacts on child health, education and development, family income and the overall economy.
The decision to reopen schools should include consideration of the following benefits:
• Allowing students to complete their studies and continue to the next level
• Essential services, access to nutrition, child welfare, such as preventing violence against children
• Social and psychological well-being
• Access to reliable information on how to keep themselves and others safe
• Reducing the risk of non-return to school
• Benefit to society, such as allowing parents to work
Answered by
1
During the pandemic, they were the first to close nationwide and would probably be the last to open.
Various states have attempted to reopen schools, with limited successes due to the resurgence of the virus. Barring some attempts, such as conduct of entrance tests and optional attendance by some pupils, schools have remained out of reach for most. The recent attempts will also face obstacles, possible lead to a rise in local infections, and other disruptions, but let us hope authorities and parents are prepared to face these. In the recent past, we have had big rallies, protests, social and religious festivities (on a reduced scale though) and crowded markets, busy roads and almost every activity, but the doors of schools have remained shut. We constantly talk about GDP growth rates but ignore schooling and education which determine, according to several scholarly studies, long-run development and growth. The incidence of infection, the school support systems and budgetary burdens are different. But we should not dismiss these examples on the ground that these countries could keep their schools open because they are developed. It can be argued that they are developed because they consider schooling to be an essential activity and do their utmost to see students do not lose out.
For example, average distance travelled by a student and the density of student population in any school are high. This makes it difficult to safeguard against the spread of the infection. While schools can bring in changes in terms of class arrangements, staggered lunch hours, reduction in physical sports, limited social interactions and year-group bubbles, they cannot control what happens outside their premises. But, more than these logistical factors, I would like to draw attention to two other issues. The school system needs more decentralisation both in terms of governance and planning. Not all decisions need to be taken at the national or state level. Local councils or districts could have chosen to stay open, depending on the spread of the disease, their local needs and capabilities. In fact, we need this flexibility and freedom at the local level not just to keep schools open but, more importantly, to address the damages wrought by the pandemic. Inequality in educational capability has no doubt been exacerbated due to the closure of institutions during the pandemic. So once schools across the country reopen, it cannot be simply teaching as usual. Schools need to reassess the needs of their pupils and do utmost to attend to these.
Please mark me the brainliest!!
Suhani
xx
Various states have attempted to reopen schools, with limited successes due to the resurgence of the virus. Barring some attempts, such as conduct of entrance tests and optional attendance by some pupils, schools have remained out of reach for most. The recent attempts will also face obstacles, possible lead to a rise in local infections, and other disruptions, but let us hope authorities and parents are prepared to face these. In the recent past, we have had big rallies, protests, social and religious festivities (on a reduced scale though) and crowded markets, busy roads and almost every activity, but the doors of schools have remained shut. We constantly talk about GDP growth rates but ignore schooling and education which determine, according to several scholarly studies, long-run development and growth. The incidence of infection, the school support systems and budgetary burdens are different. But we should not dismiss these examples on the ground that these countries could keep their schools open because they are developed. It can be argued that they are developed because they consider schooling to be an essential activity and do their utmost to see students do not lose out.
For example, average distance travelled by a student and the density of student population in any school are high. This makes it difficult to safeguard against the spread of the infection. While schools can bring in changes in terms of class arrangements, staggered lunch hours, reduction in physical sports, limited social interactions and year-group bubbles, they cannot control what happens outside their premises. But, more than these logistical factors, I would like to draw attention to two other issues. The school system needs more decentralisation both in terms of governance and planning. Not all decisions need to be taken at the national or state level. Local councils or districts could have chosen to stay open, depending on the spread of the disease, their local needs and capabilities. In fact, we need this flexibility and freedom at the local level not just to keep schools open but, more importantly, to address the damages wrought by the pandemic. Inequality in educational capability has no doubt been exacerbated due to the closure of institutions during the pandemic. So once schools across the country reopen, it cannot be simply teaching as usual. Schools need to reassess the needs of their pupils and do utmost to attend to these.
Please mark me the brainliest!!
Suhani
xx
Similar questions