why should modern weapon be prohibited
Answers
Answer:
The term assault weapon is controversial. In state and federal gun laws, it generally refers to specific semiautomatic firearm models that are designed to fire a high volume of ammunition in a controlled way or to firearms that have specified design features, such as folding stocks or pistol grips (Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, undated-a).Those in the gun industry refer to many of these firearms as modern sporting rifles, contending that assault rifle should apply only to automatic weapons used by militaries. Furthermore, they argue that the characteristics used to differentiate banned firearms from nonbanned semiautomatic weapons are cosmetic and do not make them more deadly than similar weapons without those features. In 1994, Congress passed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which banned “the manufacture of military-style assault weapons, assault weapons with specific combat features, ‘copy-cat’ models, and certain high-capacity ammunition magazines of more than ten rounds” (U.S. Department of Justice, 1994; see also Pub. L. 103-322). The law included a sunset provision, calling for its repeal after ten years. It was not renewed in 2004, and thus there is not currently a federal assault weapon ban (Plumer, 2012).
Explanation:
Answer:On the civilian level, they are already.
If in the context of nations then, biochemical weapons are already banned even in the wars.
And, no, they shouldn't be banned if the ban is considered for a single entity.
Explanation:
Modernization is common in all the eras of humanity. Modernization of vehicles, homes and everything then why should modernization of weapons be prohibited when no other nations are banning them, this will result into nation's weak border security, easy intrusion, losing and getting enslaved.
This is as simple as that.