WITH SOLUTION PLEASE
For n > 1; let 2n chess pieces be placed at the centers of 2n squares of
an n n chessboard. Show that there are four pieces among them that
formed the vertices of a parallelogram. If 2n is replaced by 2n-1; is the statement still true in general?
Answers
Answered by
1
Let m be the number of rows that
have at least 2 pieces. (Then each of the remaining n - m
rows contains
at most 1 piece.) For each of these m rows, locate the leftmost square
that contains a piece. Record the distances (i.e. number of squares)
between this piece and the other pieces on the same row. The distances
can only be 1; 2.............;n - 1 because there are n columns.
Since the number of pieces in these m rows altogether is at least 2n - (n -m) = n + m; there are at least (n + m) - m = n distances recorded altogether for these m rows. By the pigeonhole principle, at least two of these distances are the same. This implies there are at least two rows each containing 2 pieces that are of the same distance apart. These 4 pieces yield a parallelogram.
For the second question, placing 2n - 1 pieces on the squares of the first row and first column shows there are no parallelograms.
Since the number of pieces in these m rows altogether is at least 2n - (n -m) = n + m; there are at least (n + m) - m = n distances recorded altogether for these m rows. By the pigeonhole principle, at least two of these distances are the same. This implies there are at least two rows each containing 2 pieces that are of the same distance apart. These 4 pieces yield a parallelogram.
For the second question, placing 2n - 1 pieces on the squares of the first row and first column shows there are no parallelograms.
Similar questions
an n by n chessboard. Show that there are four pieces among them that formed the vertices of a parallelogram. If 2n is replaced by 2n-1; is the statement still true in general?