Write a composition on an ideal state
Answers
Answer:
In this article we will examine the ideal situation of Aristotle to see if it is a grade rather than an equivalent place. First, we need to define the meaning of hierarchy and equality. As these are common words, this seems to be a simple task. However, equality means that we all have equal rights, equality rights or equality rights. For example, during the 21st century, Sweden is generally considered to be a fairly equitable country, but even there, even everyone does not even have equality, equality, or even equality.
The subject of the problem is Aristotle's ideal view of the state. The difference between class and equality is important in understanding the ideal situation of Aristotle. He insists that an ideal country should be adjusted to maximize the happiness of its citizens. Therefore, happiness and political behavior are the ultimate goal of human life. This can be achieved by sending a better moral life. But he agrees with rank equality. On the other hand, we have equality that brings benefits to everyone; on the other hand, we have categorical differences in diversity and differences, and the middle class seems to be a means of national balance.
Philosophers are known for casting doubts on ideals; see all choices and the most important options. Aristotle and Plato are immersed in an unknown world of political situation, but Aristotle is a strict utopia structure and group of Plato compared to the ideal state of the country's personal status, representing an equal ruling country for the individual I will. The reverse is true. The ideal state of Plato is strictly constructed by utopian ideals. - Aristotle and Plato are great thinkers, but they have different views on real estate. Plato thinks that real estate will be done with thinking, but Aristotle believes real estate is tangible. Although Aristotle refers to reality as concrete, he said that reality has no meaning or existence until thought dealt with the reality. Therefore, the truth depends on your thoughts and external factors. According to Aristotle, things are considered to be ongoing and will eventually stop when they reach their potential.
In the second book "Political Science", Aristotle provided distinct from Plato's proposal and a countermeasure for the country he thought was ideal. According to Aristotle, the most ideal nation is not governed by the king of philosophers. This main characteristic of control is the distance between Aristotle and Plato. Is it natural for a group of philosophers to rule? These philosophers must be separated from private life. These are the problems Aristotle mentioned in the second book, politics. In his book, Aristotle details the roles of women, slaves, and foreigners.
MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST IF YOU FIND THIS HELPFUL :)