Write a debate in 150 – 200 words either for or against the motion:
‘Use of technology does not lead to loss of employment’. 10
Answers
Answer:
Use of technology does not lead to loss of employment (in favour)
Technology is like a two sided blade. It has both benefits and losses but it is upon the individual on how he/she uses it. Today, I will speak in favour of the motion that use of technology does not lead to loss of employment.
In the recent decade, technology has made possible those things which were just an imagination few years back. Today anything that we think of is already available online. In terms of employment, there has been a boom in the number of jobs with the implementation of a digital platform. The work performed after the technological changes took place has become easier, more effective and better quality. The output from the use of latest machines and tools has increased while the time consumed for its production has decreased. It requires one time investment to implement these changes and it makes work easier for a long time. With the technological advancements, there are more opportunities for self employment. One of the major technological changes was the online business which has become so widespread that everything from clothes to groceries to cabs available at a finger click. Just as it has made our lives easier, these services have generated a number of employments for semi-skilled people. These jobs include delivery services and cab drivers. It also provides great opportunities to resellers. At the same time, demand for skilled workers also went up as they were required to setup and manage these online businesses.
As a whole, use of technology has led to many benefits in terms of employment leading to better productivity and more labour requirements. Smart users of technology have derived many benefits from it.
Use of technology does not lead to loss of employment (against)
Technology is like a two sided blade. It has both benefits and losses but it is upon the individual on how he/she uses it. Today, I will speak against the motion that use of technology does not lead to loss of employment.
With the advancement of technology, many semi-skilled labourers have lost their jobs because they were replaced by machines who gave better productivity by investing just once. Today technology has reached to a level where even robots can be developed with the help of artificial intelligence. These robots are capable of working side by side with humans and performing simple household tasks as well. The machines are capable of producing better outcome and less time consuming. In today’s competitive and fast moving world it is almost impossible to resist change and stick to manual labour despite all technological implementations. Machines are easier to handle as compared to human because once instructed they perform the task as it is.
Technology has its own benefits but it is at the cost of other’s benefit which is a major drawback. The ones who have upgraded themselves with the changing environment are the ones who have to face difficulty in this technological world.
Plzzzz. mark it as brainliest!!!!
Answer:
“It might take employees out of what we call the ‘three Ds,’ a dull, dirty or dangerous job,” says Bob Doyle of the Association for Advancing Automation. But “[it] puts them hopefully in a different position that creates more value to the company,” he added.
Parris also cites the “three Ds” — referring specifically to flare stacks used to burn off the flammable gas from drilling operations in the Bering Sea. “These flare stacks are exposed to the elements because they’re out in the ocean, and you have to have people climb these things and look to see if there’s rust and corrosion,” Parris explains. “Who wants to do that? They’re dull, dirty abs for the unskilled or semiskilled, just the class of workers whose jobs are being eliminated by automation.”
Perhaps the piece jumped the gun by half a century. Or maybe American ingenuity will simply find a new way to self-correct. There’s hopefulness to be found in amongst all the doom and gloom of eroding manufacturing numbers.