Question

?
Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas

Answer 1

I do not support the use of controlled fires to protect wild areas.

The fires in the forest can be very harmful.

They can spoil the ecosystem.

The animals in the wild area can be controlled through other means.

For instance, animals fear sound or fire the most.

So you deploy the method of sound to help control the wild area.

Hope this may helpful

Mark me as brainlist

Answer 2

Answer:

Wild forest fires cause extensive damage to flora and fauna and result in destruction of man-made property in and around the area of the fire. 

  Controlled fires are used by agriculturists and forest officials to keep wild fires at bay. It involves careful, controlled burning of certain areas of the forest, to clear it of inflammable organic matter. In the event of fire, this cleared of area acts as a barrier for the fire from spreading any more than it has or will.

  In the process of controlled burning, several wild animals are killed and lose their habitat. The thick smoke from the man made fires is also a concern for the animals.

hope this helps <3