Write an essay on
"Partyless Democracy in Modern India"
Answers
Partyless Democracy in Modern India :
Partyless Democracy meansa democracy which avoided the parties.
It is an idea in which the democracy continues without any party . It means elections held but without any party. Just only candidates.
As that of a lottery tickets game , same thing will happened in a partyless Democracy.
It can be possible in a big nation like India .
But the representative democracy is much better than it .
The partyless Democracy is the idea based on the thinkings of Karl Marx .
You may say that all about Marxism.
And if you want an example of India , then the ideas of Mahatma Gandhi .
It means a candidate will be elected in elections without any support of the parties.
Here we just select our leader no long way to select .
But it should not be absolute. The representative democracy is better than it in many ways. Here everyone are having there own choices , they can vote their own choices, they can elect them and many more .
And the Indian Democracy is really a very good system of governance .
#Hope it helps you !!
Answer:
The Constitution of India, adopted on 26 November 1949 not by “we the people” but by the Constituent Assembly set up by our colonial rulers on 16 May 1946, accepted adult franchise, the most powerful instrument devised by man for breaking down social and economic injustice, but did not recognise political parties.
The makers of the Constitution envisaged a partyless democracy. BR Ambedkar, chairman of the drafting committee of the Constituent Assembly, said on 4 November 1948 while introducing the draft Constitution for debate, “Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment.
It has to be cultivated. We must realise that our people have yet to learn it. Democracy in India is only top-dressing on Indian soil which is essentially undemocratic.”
The Indian National Congress was a movement engaged in freedom struggle. Ignoring Mahatma Gandhi&’s advice to dissolve it after independence, leaders of the Congress, made up of people holding views from the far right to the left, converted the movement into a political party with the sole purpose of grabbing power. The party lacked constitutional or legal validity. To make matters worse, over the years it introduced the principle of hereditary succession. Most of the political parties that came after the Congress followed suit. From the Abdullahs of Kashmir to Karunanidhi of Kanyakumari they have established minor political dynasties. Thomas Paine in his immortal book, Rights of Man, wrote: “When the mind of a nation is bowed down by hereditary succession, it loses a considerable portion of its powers…Hereditary succession requires the same obedience to ignorance as to wisdom; and when once the mind can bring itself to pay this indiscriminate reverence, it descends below the statue of mental manhood. It is fit to be great only in little things.”
Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act allows for small groups of people to form political parties by making a simple declaration. The result is the proliferation of parties with no political ideology or programme. More than 1,200 political parties are registered with the Election Commission. When it comes to elections, less than one-third of them participate. Collecting government advertisements for their ‘official’ organ or publication is one of their major sources of income. During elections many of these parties get into the fray only to withdraw in favour of one of the mainstream parties for a price. No political parties, including the Congress and the BJP, hold proper internal elections or publish their audited accounts. Two years ago the Central Information Commission decided that the Right to Information Act was applicable to all political parties, in keeping with the spirit of democracy. The Congress, which enacted the RTI Act, joined the rest in opposing it tooth and nail.