Question

Write the difference between Court Historians and Court Chronicles.​

Answer 1

Hi mate here your answer

Chronicles were essentially a collection of comprehensive and recorded court accounts that were kept in chronological order. The writing was frequently in prose or verse, but there was no attempt to be literary. They contain historical knowledge, including events, historical, political, and cultural perspectives of its authors and viewers. A chronicle is a collection of noteworthy historical events that are often unanalyzed and uninterpreted.

Mark me brainleast

Answer 2

While chronicles are scholarly accounts, historians are academic journals.

• Chronicles refer to academic descriptions of mighty kingdoms, their noble courtiers, and the present situations of ordinary people.
• The considerable majority of legendary kings naturally had court chroniclers who meticulously recorded events during their notable reign.
• The historian is an evaluated and assessed scholarly document devoted to the study of court history.  
• The magazine published twice a year contains essays on the history of royal and princely courts from the late Middle Ages to the current day.