Question

Write three sentences contrasting the Federalist and Anti-Federalist viewpoints on separation of powers in the Constitution.

Define “separation of powers” and summarize the writers’ views

Answer 1

Answer:

Separation of powers is the idea that power in a government should be broken up or divided. This is shown in the US government with the 3 branches of government. The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches work together yet separately to run the government.

Answer 2

Answer:

The concept of separation of powers holds that authority within a government should be split up or separated. The three branches of government in the US government demonstrate this. The government is controlled by the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, which cooperate while operating independently.

Explanation:

Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government did not provide Congress and the national government with enough power to carry out its legislation. As a result, many individuals believed that they needed a strong central authority.

As a result, a special gathering of delegates was summoned to create the United States of America's first constitution. The foundation of the Federal government by the convention thus supplanted the national government under the Articles of Confederation.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wished to amend the Articles of Confederation. Because they did not want it to turn into a tyrant as the British one did, the Anti-Federalists opposed the federalists' establishment of a new constitution. They thus sought to amend the Articles of Confederation.

Federalists:

• Federalists were those who favored the Constitution and a more powerful national republic.
• They said that: The rights of the people were secured by the division of powers among three autonomous branches. Since all three branches are equal, no one group can rule over the others because each branch represents a distinct component of the people.

Anti-Federalists:

• Anti-Federalists were those who opposed the adoption of the Constitution and advocated for a limited, localized government.
• There is the anti-federalist perspective, which might be compared to a rigid separation of powers. They desired that the legislature hold the deciding authority. They were doing all the legislating, the government would only put the laws into effect, and the court would decide on the cases.