"You may call for peace as loudly as you wish, but where there is no brotherhood there can in
the end be no peace." What is your view on the need for brotherhood if we hope for peace in the
world? no men in foreign
Answers
Answer:
There may not be a ‘need’ for a universal brotherhood. What would be the point of joining one knowing that you will probably disagree with most of the other members on just about everything?
There are lots of limited “brotherhoods,” which came into being to serve people sharing a common belief, or common experiences. The Veterans of Foreign Wars serves, well, obviously, the veterans of foreign wars. The Freemasons caters to good men of faith, the Boy and Girl Scouts serve young kids and adolescents. The great religions attract all those who believe pretty much alike. The same with political parties - conservatives, liberals, and radicals at both ends have their “brotherhoods.” The NAACP recruits African-Americans, the KKK recruits bigots. AA exists for alcoholics. Whether a church, fraternity, club, party, or whatever, they’re all “brotherhoods” of a sort.
The problem with your questions is the word ‘universal.’ None of the “brotherhoods” mentioned above is universal, or cares to be. They target a specific, limited audience, and have no interest in attracting folks who don’t meet their arbitrary standards, or share their particular goals.
With over 7 billion people, and each of them unique, the odds of coming with a brotherhood that would be universal is, at best, remote.