A good full conclusion for my projext on revolt in 1857 in your words
Answers
Answered by
206
CONCLUSION ON THE REVOLT OF 1857 - 58 :
The British rule was antagonistic to all sections of the society — whether rulers, nawabs, zamindar's, artisans and Craftsman, and tribals. They all carried a feeling of hatred and grudge against the east India company. It is obvious that when people resented the policies of the company, they would rise in rebellion. it was just a matter of time, when they would rebel .
In this case , the army refused to load the new cartridges into rifle , as they were lined with fat of the cow and lard of the pig, both repugnant to the Hindus and Muslims . It provided a spark, which erupted into a revolt.
Since, In the middle of the 18 th century , the indian rulers were gradually losing their power, authority and honour. Many of them had to sign the subsidiary alliance . The Doctrine of lapse , further added fuel to fire, when Lord Dalhousie annexed many states, in complete disregard of the age- old tradition that the adopted son's could inherit the throne, e.g :- Satara, Jhasi,Nagpur.
Many Indian rulers tried to negotiate with the East India Company to protect their interests , e.g :- Rani laxmibai of Jhasi wanted the company to recognise her adopted son as the heir, after the death of her husband. Nana Saheb , the adopted son of peshwa baji Rao II asked the company that he should be given the pension, when his adoptive father died. The company refused to accept these requests . and Finally , awadh was annexed .
Next , the company planned to bring Mughal dynasty to an end . The descendants of the Mughal emperor Bhadhur Shah II were given orders by Lord dalhousie , to vacate the Red fort .
-------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
BEST OF LUCK ;-)
#akashmandal.
The British rule was antagonistic to all sections of the society — whether rulers, nawabs, zamindar's, artisans and Craftsman, and tribals. They all carried a feeling of hatred and grudge against the east India company. It is obvious that when people resented the policies of the company, they would rise in rebellion. it was just a matter of time, when they would rebel .
In this case , the army refused to load the new cartridges into rifle , as they were lined with fat of the cow and lard of the pig, both repugnant to the Hindus and Muslims . It provided a spark, which erupted into a revolt.
Since, In the middle of the 18 th century , the indian rulers were gradually losing their power, authority and honour. Many of them had to sign the subsidiary alliance . The Doctrine of lapse , further added fuel to fire, when Lord Dalhousie annexed many states, in complete disregard of the age- old tradition that the adopted son's could inherit the throne, e.g :- Satara, Jhasi,Nagpur.
Many Indian rulers tried to negotiate with the East India Company to protect their interests , e.g :- Rani laxmibai of Jhasi wanted the company to recognise her adopted son as the heir, after the death of her husband. Nana Saheb , the adopted son of peshwa baji Rao II asked the company that he should be given the pension, when his adoptive father died. The company refused to accept these requests . and Finally , awadh was annexed .
Next , the company planned to bring Mughal dynasty to an end . The descendants of the Mughal emperor Bhadhur Shah II were given orders by Lord dalhousie , to vacate the Red fort .
-------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
BEST OF LUCK ;-)
#akashmandal.
AkashMandal:
Hopes it helps !!
Answered by
150
Conclusion of Revolt 1857
The revolt of 1857 was an unprecedented event in the history of British rule in India.It united, though in a limited way, many sections of Indian society for a common cause.Though the revolt failed to achieve the desired goal, it sowed the seeds of Indian nationalism.
............................
hope it helped
if the answer is helpfull please mark it as the brainliest answer
Similar questions