Question

"A man could be the father of his son’s flesh, but that did not mean that he was also the father of his spirit." Do you agree with this statement? Explain what it implies.

Answer 1

A man could be a father of his son's flesh, but that did not mean that he was also the father of his spirit. This statement states that a father can stop his son from making a wrong move but he cannot stop his son from thinking that way. Father has control over his son's body not on his mind.

PLEASE MARK IT BRAINILIEST

Answer 2

" A man could be a father of his son's flesh, but that did not mean that he was also the father of his spirit. This statement states that a father can stop his son from making a wrong move but he cannot stop his son from thinking that way. Father has control over his son's body not on his mind.

HOPE IT HELPS

PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST ☺️