A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?
Answers
Answered by
8
Hey mate, here is your answer ===
If there is no evolution takes place in her DNA then the evidence will be same genes from her parents.
Hope it helps u dear :)
If there is no evolution takes place in her DNA then the evidence will be same genes from her parents.
Hope it helps u dear :)
Answered by
3
Evolution refers to the procedure of modification in all the life forms over generations, and evolutionary biology refers to the study of how evolution has taken place. The biological populations develop through genetic modifications, which resemble with the variations in the species observable traits.
In the given case, the proof to be shown by the scientist for her to be correct would be weak genetic organisms and strong genetic resemblances in the distantly associated species.
Similar questions