English, asked by marivellecera, 3 months ago

compare and contrast Rizal and morga different views about pilipino and Philippine culture. ​

Answers

Answered by steffiaspinno
13

Rizal and morga have different views about Pilipino and Philippine culture. ​

  • Antonio de Morga, lieutenant governor of the Philippines withinside the overdue 16th century, defined the meals of the Indios as follows: Their each day fare consists of: lice overwhelmed in wood pillars and while cooking is known as Mosqueda (that is the staple in the course of the land); cooked fish which they have got in abundance; pork, venison, mountain buffaloes which they name carabaos, red meat and fish which they recognize is pleasant while it has commenced to mt and stink (Retana 1909,174).
  • Rizal becomes so incensed that he later replied in print with: This is some other preoccupation of the Spaniards who, lii every other nation, deal with meals to which they're now no longer accustomed or is unknown to them with disgust. The English, for ample, experience horror to look a Spaniard ingesting snails. To the Spaniard roast red meat is repugnant and he can't understand how Steak Tartar or uncooked red meat may be eaten; the Chinese who've taltlcn' and consume shark can't stand Roquefort cheese etc. etc. This fish that Morga mentions, that can't be exact till it starts offevolved to mt, are bagoong [salted and fermented fish or shrimp paste used as a sauce in Filipino cuisine] and people who've eaten it and tasted it recognize that it nor is nor must be rotten (Rizal 1890, 264): Rizal's sarcastic rebuttal appears, surprisingly, now no longer in his satirical novels or his polemical tracts, however in scholarly paintings--his annotated reedition of Morga's Success de has Ishas Filipinas. Aside from the racial slurs to which he becomes reacting, however, RW maintained combined emotions for the Morga, relying on its usefulness for his thesis that Spanish colonization retarded, in preference to added civilization to, the Philippines and its inhabitants.
  • Unfortunately, Rizal's Morga has been relegated withinside the canon, below his "minor writings" (Craig 1927), and stays in large part unread because of the pre-eminence of his novels, Noli me ta'ngere and El Filibusterismo. Unlike the novels, that have been attacked and condemned often withinside the beyond a century, the Morga stays in large part ignored. It is lamentable that, notwithstanding king, a conventional of nationalist historic writing, Rizal's Morga is seldom examined nowadays. That Rizal's annotations are in large part left out nowadays stems essentially from the current advances in historic, archaeological and ethnographic research.
  • Although lots of Rizal's assertions were established via way of means of current research, the truth is that his paintings are now dated. Moreover, Rizal's annotations are secondary, and modern-day pupils pay more attention extra to the number one source, Morga, than on Rizal's notes. Few Filipinos nowadays, even the maximum patriotic, might discover the time and strength to examine the small textual content of Rizal's footnotes, despite the fact that penned via way of means of the countrywide hero. Another element withinside the relative obscurity of Rizal's annotations to Morga become censorship in the course of the Spanish colonial period. Like Noli me ta'ngere and El Filibusterismo, the Rizal version of Morga become banned withinside the Philippines withinside the overdue 19th century. Therefore copies confiscated via way of means of Spanish customs in Manila and different ports of access had been destroyed.
  • Due to the burning of 1 especially big cargo of the Morga, the e-book attained "rare" and "out of print? repute within 12 months of its publication. It did now no longer have a 2nd printing, and the few copies in the move had been left hidden and unread via way of means of nervous owners. There is likewise the trouble of language, which constrained the effect of the Morga to a small, educated, Spanish-studying elite in Manila. Among this already minute circle, one ought to remember with the hands of 1 hand, the folks that might examine historic paintings like Morga in preference to the extra unique Rizal novels. Rizal's Morga becomes now no longer examined via way of means of the masses, despite the fact that humans heard an extremely good deal approximately these arguable paintings. Rizal's Morga, therefore unread, is nearly forgotten.
  • This article offers Rizal's perspectives on Philippine records. It tries to location Rizal's Morga withinside the framework of his paintings, in addition to withinside the large context of Philippine historiography. Rizal's Morga won't be examined widely, however its importance lies withinside the truth that with this version, Rizal commenced the venture of writing the primary Philippine records from the perspective of a Filipino.
Attachments:
Answered by brokendreams
4
  • Compared to the morgas, the Pilipinos were poor, but had a greater understanding of the real issues faced by their society.
  • They were not perfect people but were able to articulate more clearly what they believed than the morgas.
  • ​They also had a greater sense of humour, and were more inclined to play practical jokes.
  • The Pilipinos were also more open about expressing their views and people were more willing to listen to them because they knew that their neighbours were also confronting similar difficulties.
  • Throughout the Pilipino revolution, the Philippines was plagued with political unrest, economic crises, and a long-standing lack of transparency.  
  • Bolstered by the influx of foreign loans and investment and a new democratic political system, the Philippines’ economy boomed.  
  • The Philippines has become one of the most economically stable and politically stable countries in the region.

#SPJ3

Similar questions
Math, 3 months ago