debate against the motion of 2 minutes mechanical teachers can never replace human teachers
Answers
Explanation:
Simply put: Robots won’t replace teachers because they can’t inspire us.
In a world where young people are retreating more and more into virtual unreality, the teaching profession has become more important than it ever was. It is teaching that keeps it real – teaching that keeps young people alive.
It’s the talk of the town – when you say the word “future”, you hear “robots”. Artificial intelligence is rapidly growing, and that fear of losing your job to technology has become very real.
Even the tech wizard himself, Steve Jobs, believed that while technology can solve many societal problems, it’s not as simple as handing it over to a computer. At least not when it comes to teaching.
“The most important thing is a person. A person who incites your curiosity and feeds your curiosity; and machines cannot do that in the same way that people can,” Jobs said, according to a transcript of his famous 1995 interview with Computerworld’s Daniel Morrow
Children learn something new every day, and if it is a toss-up between knowing the date of the Civil Rights Movement or sitting with a new kid at lunch, I hope for the latter.
When it boils down to it, artificial intelligence is miles ahead of a teacher/educator when coming to efficiency. But I’ll leave you with Tan’s words:
“If efficiency is having the ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answers – teachers and educators are human beings and are prone to making mistakes. But if efficiency means having a well-rounded education that focuses on student’s creative, academic, social and emotional wellbeing, then teachers win hands down.”