Discuss if political theory is dead o 500 words
Answers
Concept Introduction:-
The methodical process of organising knowledge about the cosmos into testable, comprehensible, and predictable hypotheses is known as science. Science is the systematic process of organising knowledge about the cosmos into testable, understandable, and predictable hypotheses.
Explanation:-
We have been given a question that discussess if political theory is dead o words
We need to find the solution to the question
Political theory cannot die, much as some people might like it to. As Aristotle put it, man is a political animal, in the sense that the urge towards social organization seems to be built in to our very natures. There always have been, and always will be, people thinking hard about what the correct and proper forms of social organization look like. These people are political theorists, and short of hunting them down and killing them — an unfortunately consistent practice across many societies — they will always be writing their books, or pamphlets, or podcasts, or otherwise making themselves known. Political theory as an academic discipline is a somewhat different question, because there are odd social forces at work in academia as well. In the US, for instance, Political Theory is fairly rare as a discipline or specialty, because US universities have adopted a market model that theory suffers under: wealthy donors dislike political theory because they consider it ‘activist’; Political Science departments often label theory as ‘unscientific’ and push students away from it; academic publications favor more pedantic works involving statistical or structural analysis, and shy away from publishing pure theory. People wishing to study political theory in the US often have to move into the humanities or into Critical Theory departments. Prospects are a bit brighter in Europe, where there is a large academic interest in Social Theory and the University system is less concerned with market forces, but outside of the cultured West, well. Best not to go there. Modern-day politics is boiling with the potential for political theory discussions. The recidivistic rise of nationalism and fascism in the West is tearing holes in the fabric of Liberal philosophy we all live within, and sooner or later someone is going o have to rebuild or transcend Liberalism into a new philosophy, a new political theory that we can all live by. when and how that might happen is an open question (though I expect, from watching current political trajectories, that things are going to get uglier before we build up the steam we need to break the nationalist stranglehold and assert a new philosophy). But it will happen, and it will be political theory that brings it about. That is the nature of the human beast.
Final Answer:-
The correct answer is Political theory cannot die, much as some people might like it to.
#SPJ2
Political Theory theory shape our thought process towards society from where we belong to. That is why as a student of political science we should study political theory. People in every society carry ideas. From those ideas you can understand your position in that society. Political theory helps us understand those concepts and helps us to realize our identity. Political theory helps to understand what is actually happening surrounding us and throughout the world as well. Political theory tells you how you do collect data from those political events and how to study it systematically.
Political theory cannot die, much as some people might like it to. As Aristotle put it, man is a political animal, in the sense that the urge towards social organization seems to be built in to our very natures. One of the reasons for the decline of political theory is the over-reliance on scientific methods in order to elevate political science to the level of science. The conventional idea is that science and theory are synonymous. In reality, it is not right.
Theory is not just any opining about human existence in society, it rather is an attempt at formulating the meaning of existence by explicating the content of a definitive class of experiences. Its argument is not arbitrary, but derives its validity from the aggregate of experiences to which it must permanently refer for empirical control.
#SPJ3
Learn more about this topic on:
https://brainly.in/question/4796493