essay on winning at all cost is not right
Answers
At a recent Q & A session I was asked an interesting question. The question was "What personal philosophy of mine had changed most over my twenty five years as a Manager?" This was interesting as my views on a lot of aspects of leadership have changed over the years and hopefully I'm more of an authentic leader than I was when I was younger. Pondering over the question, I believe the personal philosophy of mine that has changed the most is my approach towards winning. I used to believe that winning at all costs was the right way, and if that meant cheating or lying so be it. The main thing was winning. Now I have a different approach. I believe that if victory comes at the cost of your integrity and honour then the victory is not a true victory, just a mere illusion of one. Don't get me wrong. I'm incredibly competitive. In fact I believe I'm more competitive now than I was when I was younger but I've seen the consequences of winning without honour and it's not pretty. Let me explain more.
There is an age old saying "all is fair in love and war" but is it?
If you believe in winning at all costs then you may have won the battle but have lost the war or the very purpose for what you have been fighting. In terms of sports, a typical area where winning at all costs is commonly demonstrated is a player cheating to win a game yet he also may have just lost his credibility and with that his fans, future contracts, sponsorships and other match opportunities to prove himself and his talent. He may have killed his career before it began. How often have you seen football players purposely dive in the penalty area in order to win a penalty. They do this so often that they gain a reputation for it to such a degree that eventually referees stop awarding them penalties even in instances when they have been legitimately fouled. Sports stars who get involved in scandals soon see their sponsors quietly depart long before their loyal fans do likewise.
When I was younger I worked as a Broker Sales Manager in a Finance house in London. The environment was all about getting the deal at all costs and I along with a lot of young men at the time did exactly that. We got the deal and if it cost us our friends, our girlfriends or even our family we did just that. It was all about money and all about winning. I was in my early twenties and to be honest I loved the brutal raw competition but looking back now I was wrong. Winning without honour is not worth it and the reason for my answer may not be what you first think of.
If you win without honour you have already lost, you just don’t realise it yet.
The people who feel that you should be prepared to win without honour and at all costs, tend to think this way because their mentality doesn’t match their own ethical and moral beliefs. This demonstrates conflict within themselves generating negative energy bringing them down in the long term. The majority of people believe that winning without honour is just not the right way to approach life because it's "not right" but there is another reason why honour is so important. The reason why you should compete with a strict ethical code is because that is the only way you will realise your full potential. Let me explain why.
Nearly every successful person is driven by some demons, whether those demons were generated by the need for revenge, or idealism or just plain survival. They have this hunger that the majority of people haven’t got. When you meet the very best, and I mean the world-class successful people, the best of the best people who are fulfilling their complete potential, they have something extra. Deep down they are all nice people; they have a manageable ego and come across as genuinely nice people.
They still have their demons driving them but they are kept in check by their moral beliefs and their code of honour. They have a clear conscience and are effectively guided by their inner angels which mean they are able to fully focus without any of the self-doubts that naturally come with these motivating demons.
Warren Buffet, who is widely considered to be the successful investor in the 20th century, has commonly sealed deals with just a handshake.
Lionel Messi, The Barcelona and Argentina forward and best footballer in the world recently said; “I am more worried about being a good person than being the best football player in the world. When all this is over, what are you left with?”
Answer:
The required essay on winning at all costs is not right is shown below:
Explanation:
Winning at all costs is not right
People have the capacity to go beyond simply winning to "winning at any costs," and such interactions have the potential to have lasting negative effects.
It is challenging to work cooperatively to produce solutions that improve outcomes for everyone when individuals view conflict as a competition—a zero-sum game where someone wins and someone loses. In essence, when we pursue a victory at any cost, we are adopting a different strategy that favors competition over cooperation.
Because of how competitive our society is, adopting the winning at any costs strategy is simple. There are undoubtedly characteristics of a competitive attitude that can lead to improved performance. However, we see that trying to win at any cost actually has a price in conflict situations.
People frequently become defensive when they believe that others are doing everything in their power to get their way. They frequently do not support the conclusion and contribute nothing to its implementation. Therefore, pursuing victory at any cost might harm outcomes and damage relationships. People don't enjoy having their interests neglected, and relationships can suffer when someone disregards them in order to forward their own agenda. This is especially problematic when relationships span between interdependent individuals who genuinely depend on one another for support both now and in the future.
You might want to consider whether you are engaging in winning at all costs behaviors if you are someone who is very task-focused and works hard to acquire what you want. If this is the case, it would be wise to take your time and consider how you could contribute to the creation of cooperative solutions that serve your interests while also potentially addressing those of the other parties involved in the disagreement.
We advise paying close attention to the other person so you can comprehend how he or she sees the problem and what his or her potential interests are. This will help you design joint solutions. You'll undoubtedly want to express your own views and desires. You can then start brainstorming potential solutions and evaluate them to determine if they satisfy your demands and take into account the interests of the other party. It is typically simpler to obtain cooperation in putting these kinds of cooperative solutions into practice when you uncover them and they benefit both sides.
#SPJ2