how does the government promote law and order
Answers
ᴜʀ ᴀɴsᴡᴇʀ࿐
ʙʏ ᴘʀᴏᴍᴏᴛɪɴɢ ᴀ ɢᴏᴠᴇʀɴᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴏғ ʟᴀᴡ, ᴇǫᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴀᴘᴘʟɪᴄᴀʙʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴀʟʟ ᴡɪᴛʜᴏᴜᴛ ᴅɪsᴄʀɪᴍɪɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴ, ᴛʜᴇ ʀᴜʟᴇ ᴏғ ʟᴀᴡ ᴍᴀᴋᴇs ᴘᴏʟɪᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴇᴄᴏɴᴏᴍɪᴄ ᴏᴘᴘᴏʀᴛᴜɴɪᴛɪᴇs ᴀᴠᴀɪʟᴀʙʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴀʟʟ ᴍᴇᴍʙᴇʀs ᴏғ sᴏᴄɪᴇᴛʏ. ɪᴛ ᴇᴍᴘᴏᴡᴇʀs ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ʙʏ ᴘʀᴏᴠɪᴅɪɴɢ ᴀ ʀɪɢʜᴛ ᴏғ ᴀᴄᴄᴇss ᴛᴏ ᴘᴜʙʟɪᴄ sᴇʀᴠɪᴄᴇs, ᴍᴀᴋɪɴɢ sᴛᴀᴛᴇ ᴇɴᴛɪᴛɪᴇs ᴀᴄᴄᴏᴜɴᴛᴀʙʟᴇ ғᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇʟɪᴠᴇʀʏ ᴏғ sᴜᴄʜ sᴇʀᴠɪᴄᴇs.
ᴛʜᴀɴᴋ ʏᴏᴜ~❤
Answer:
In modern politics, law and order, also known as tough on crime and the War on Crime, is demands for a strict criminal justice system, especially in relation to violent and property crime, through stricter criminal penalties. These penalties may include longer terms of imprisonment, mandatory sentencing, three-strikes laws, and in some countries, capital punishment. The War on Crime has been credited with facilitating greater militarization of police and contributing to mass incarceration in the United States.[1][2]
Supporters of "law and order", generally from the right-wing, argue that incarceration is the most effective means of crime prevention. Opponents, typically left-wing, argue that a system of harsh criminal punishment is ultimately ineffective because it self-perpetuates crime and does not address underlying or systemic causes of crime.
To differing extents, crime has also been a prominent issue in Canadian, British, Australian, South African, French, German, and New Zealand politics.