how girls became a soldier's
Answers
Answer:
In the more global sense, many western nations have opened up their armed forces to women, though not necessarily to front line combat. Some restrict women, as the US used to, to non-combat, nautical, or aviation roles.
Many aspects of modern combat have greatly mitigated the historical reasons for excluding women as potential soldiers. When physical strength was one of the chief limiting factors for soldiering, women were at a distinct disadvantage, generally speaking. With firearms, aircraft, tanks, and modern ships, there is much less need for burly men running everything.
For soldiers, which I take to mean infantry or Army personnel, the main concerns at the tactical level have to do with strength for tasks like carrying equipment and wounded comrades. Some of it also has to do with the social aspects of combat units, though that is mostly a concern for tightly knit special operations units. Since these factors are minor in the larger picture of having people capable of completing most combat tasks, and most women can do the problem tasks anyway.
At the societal level, recruiting women during a major war can have implications for the nation as a whole. When a large chunk of your male population dies from war or some catastrophe, it is possible to make up those losses within one generation. Women are more critical to maintaining a recruitable population in a decades long conflict than men, you just throw out monogamy. However, this only applies to long wars and assumes conscription.
mark the brainliest....
plzzzz