How has the scope of Right to Life expanded by judicial interpretations?
Class 11
Answers
Answer:
he Right to Life and Personal Liberty is assured by the Indian Constitution under Article 21. This is a very important and wide topic and has several implications for the citizens of India. In this article, you can read all about Article 21 and what it entails for the UPSC IAS exam.
Kickstart your IAS exam preparation now with the UPSC Previous Year Question Papers!!
Also, refer to the links below to ace the upcoming examination:
Fundamental Rights – Articles 12-35 (Part III of Indian Constitution)
Important Articles in Indian Constitution
Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)
Indian Polity Notes For UPSC
Article 12 – Definition of State for Part III of the Indian Constitution
Right to Life
According to Article 21:
“Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.”
This fundamental right is available to every person, citizens and foreigners alike.
Article 21 provides two rights:
Right to life
Right to personal liberty
The fundamental right provided by Article 21 is one of the most important rights that the Constitution guarantees.
The Supreme Court of India has described this right as the ‘heart of fundamental rights’.
The right specifically mentions that no person shall be deprived of life and liberty except as per the procedure established by law. This implies that this right has been provided against the State only. State here includes not just the government, but also, government departments, local bodies, the Legislatures, etc.
Any private individual encroaching on these rights of another individual does not amount to a violation of Article 21. The remedy for the victim, in this case, would be under Article 226 or under general law.
The right to life is not just about the right to survive. It also entails being able to live a complete life of dignity and meaning.
The chief goal of Article 21 is that when the right to life or liberty of a person is taken away by the State, it should only be according to the prescribed procedure of law.
Interpretation of Article 21
Judicial intervention has ensured that the scope of Article 21 is not narrow and restricted. It has been widening by several landmark judgements.
A few important cases concerned with Article 21:
AK Gopalan Case (1950): Until the 1950s, Article 21 had a bit of a narrow scope. In this case, the SC held that the expression ‘procedure established by law’, the Constitution has embodied the British concept of personal liberty rather than the American ‘due process’.
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India Case (1978): This case overturned the Gopalan case judgement. Here, the SC said that Articles 19 and 21 are not watertight compartments. The idea of personal liberty in Article 21 has a wide scope including many rights, some of which are embodied under Article 19, thus giving them ‘additional protection’. The court also held that a law that comes under Article 21 must satisfy the requirements under Article 19 as well. That means any procedure under law for the deprivation of life or liberty of a person must not be unfair, unreasonable or arbitrary. Read the Maneka Gandhi case in detail in the linked article.
Francis Coralie Mullin vs. Union Territory of Delhi (1981): In this case, the court held that any procedure for the deprivation of life or liberty of a