History, asked by karanbisht75, 9 months ago

In contrast, radicals wanted a nation in which government was
on the majority of a country's population Many supported women's
suffragette movements. Unlike liberals, they opposed the legs.
of great landowners and wealthy factory owners. They were out
against the existence of private property but disliked concentration
of
property in the hands of a few​

Answers

Answered by sheenujsph
2

Answer:ERALS

Liberals wanted a nation which tolerated all religions.

Liberals also opposed the uncontrolled power of dynastic rulers.  

They wanted to safeguard the rights of individuals against governments.  

They argued for a representative, elected parliamentary government, subject to laws interpreted by a well-trained judiciary that was independent of rulers and officials.

They did not believe in universal adult franchise, that is, the right of every citizen to vote.

They felt men of property mainly should have the vote.

They also did not want the vote for women.

Radicals wanted a nation in which government was based on the majority of a country’s population.

Many supported women’s suffragette movements.

Unlike liberals, they opposed the privileges of great landowners and wealthy factory owners. They were not against the existence of private property but disliked concentration of property in the hands of a few.

Answered by yadavsunita1207
0

Answer:

liberals and radicals might have been together that would have been better for the nation..

Similar questions