is indian judiciary system is flawless and transparent ?
Answers
Answered by
0
It is partly because of the false presumption that judiciary can be independent only if it isolates itself from the government and the other institutions.
Just as academics believe that they should be the sole decision makers on all academic issues. Same goes for doctors, lawyers, and most other professionals.
They don't seem to understand that this will only lead to inbreeding, which is counterproductive.
Read the names of Judges in SC (and to an extent, even HCS). You'll find the same last name often repeated. Even if not done intentionally, judges have come to believe that judgeship runs in the blood. How are they different from the Cong and other family owned political parties?
SC lost a great opportunity to reform when NJAC was rejected in toto. If they had specific objections to certain clauses of NJAC, they could have recommended specific changes.
Even now SC can review the NJAC decision suo moto.
Just as academics believe that they should be the sole decision makers on all academic issues. Same goes for doctors, lawyers, and most other professionals.
They don't seem to understand that this will only lead to inbreeding, which is counterproductive.
Read the names of Judges in SC (and to an extent, even HCS). You'll find the same last name often repeated. Even if not done intentionally, judges have come to believe that judgeship runs in the blood. How are they different from the Cong and other family owned political parties?
SC lost a great opportunity to reform when NJAC was rejected in toto. If they had specific objections to certain clauses of NJAC, they could have recommended specific changes.
Even now SC can review the NJAC decision suo moto.
sonymadheshiya:
no
trishala where is your home and what is your full name
trishala are you my best friend
please except my friendship
I want to become a doctor in sony madheshiya
where are you trishala
trishala are you angry with me answer me trishala i am naughty girl
ok
I live in Mumbai
hi good morning
Answered by
0
It is partly because of the false presumption that judiciary can be independent only if it isolates itself from the government and the other institutions.
Just as academics believe that they should be the sole decision makers on all academic issues. Same goes for doctors, lawyers, and most other professionals.
They don't seem to understand that this will only lead to inbreeding, which is counterproductive.
Read the names of Judges in SC (and to an extent, even HCS). You'll find the same last name often repeated. Even if not done intentionally, judges have come to believe that judgeship runs in the blood. How are they different from the Cong and other family owned political parties?
SC lost a great opportunity to reform when NJAC was rejected in toto. If they had specific objections to certain clauses of NJAC, they could have recommended specific changes.
Even now SC can review the NJAC decision suo moto.
Just as academics believe that they should be the sole decision makers on all academic issues. Same goes for doctors, lawyers, and most other professionals.
They don't seem to understand that this will only lead to inbreeding, which is counterproductive.
Read the names of Judges in SC (and to an extent, even HCS). You'll find the same last name often repeated. Even if not done intentionally, judges have come to believe that judgeship runs in the blood. How are they different from the Cong and other family owned political parties?
SC lost a great opportunity to reform when NJAC was rejected in toto. If they had specific objections to certain clauses of NJAC, they could have recommended specific changes.
Even now SC can review the NJAC decision suo moto.
Similar questions