Minor is liable for torts. this statement is true or not?
Answers
Answer:
Minor is liable for torts. this statement is true or not?
A minor is liable in tort as an adult but the tort must be independent of the contract. A minor's agreement is void even if he fraudulently represents himself to be of full age as established in Sadik Ali Khan v.
Explanation:
true
Answer:
This statement is true.
A minor is liable in wrongful conduct as associate degree adult however the wrongful conduct should be freelance of the contract. A minor’s agreement is void, although he fraudulently represents himself to be of full age as established in Sadik Ali Khan v. Jaikishore. Similarly, in R. Leslie Ltd v. Shiell [1914] three K.B. 607 at 620 a minor was proof against any written agreement charges or compensation inspite of availing loan facilities by fraudulently sticking himself of full age. Within the same case it had been established that it's attainable to compel a minor for specific restitution if he fraudulently nonheritable some property and continues to be up to speed and possession of that property. Though, now, the common law court has discretion to order the transfer back of the property nonheritable even while not fraud, if still in possession, beneath section 3(1) of the Minors’ Contracts Act 1987. Just in case of a bail, contract with minor isn't necessary for restoration of the products on the determination of the legal transfer.
#SPJ3