Question

The act of stealing cannot be considered right even if it is done for a good purpose comment.​

Answer 1

Answer:

Aram justifies Mourad's stealing of the horse for two reasons; one, Aram does not believe it is the same as stealing, as they weren't doing it for money but to ride the horse for fun. He also justifies it because he has an enthusiasm and love for horses, and this opportunity may not come again, since their family is so poor.

Explanation:

This is just an explanation to understand the answer i have given above

First take a look at Aram's thoughts and feelings when he is first offered the chance to ride the horse by his cousin, Mourad:

Well, it seemed to me stealing a horse for a ride was not the same thing as stealing something else, such as money. For all I knew, maybe it wasn't stealing at all. If you were crazy about horses the way my cousin Mourad and I were, it wasn't stealing.

In Aram's mind, when Mourad took this horse, he had no intention of selling it to make a profit and, therefore, his actions cannot be described as theft. As such, he does not need to justify what has happened because he does not believe that his cousin, Mourad, has broken the law.

Moreover, Aram is easily able to justify his own riding of the horse. He allows himself to ride because he is "crazy" about horses and this provides him with a rare opportunity to indulge his passion. His family is so poor that this chance might not come about again so he must seize it, before it is time to return the horse to its rightful owner.

hope uh like it .. mark it brainliest if UH feel like its correct.. thank uh ❤