The development in natural science has had an impact on sociology as discipline
Answers
Answer:
Sociologists have always tried to shape their science according to the model of the natural sciences. Critics of sociology object that sociology is not yet and never will be a science of this type. By "natural science" they mean physics, though they do not say so. They ignore other natural sciences, like geology, geography, and meteorology, which deal with objects just as complex and resistant to precision as social phenomena are. In reality, sociology can make studies of both types: precise measurements of small social units and their causal explanation, as in physics, and estimates and low correlations of more complex phenomena, as in geology.
Explanation:
Yes, the development of natural science has had an impact on sociology as a discipline.
Explanation:
- Sociologists have always attempted to form their research according to the paradigm of the natural sciences. Sociology opponents argue that sociology is not yet, and will never be such a study. They imply physics by "natural science," although they are not stating so.
- We neglect other natural sciences, such as geology, astronomy, and meteorology, which treat structures as dynamic and accuracy insensitive as social phenomena are.
- In fact, sociology may perform studies of both types: precise measurements of small social units and their causal interpretation, as in physics; and estimates and weak associations of more complex phenomena, as in geology.
Learn more about sociology
Sociology as a scientific discipline
https://brainly.in/question/12933904
Why study of social sciences (mainly why sociology is need of society?
https://brainly.in/question/12894954