History, asked by meenusinghbhadauriya, 1 month ago

The native rulers of India were a victim of the Divide and Rule Policy of the British”. Prove the given statement true through some examples.




Someone please tell me the answer. Please help me in doing this answer and yes please don't give me any other or any inappropriate answer. ​

Answers

Answered by alimaheen702
0

Answer:

Divide and rule (Latin: divide et impera), or divide and conquer, in politics and sociology is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into pieces that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy

Explanation:

The use of this technique is meant to empower the sovereign to control subjects, populations, or factions of different interests, who collectively might be able to oppose its rule. Niccolò Machiavelli identifies a similar application to military strategy, advising in Book VI of The Art of War (1521)(L'arte della guerra):a Captain should endeavor with every act to divide the forces of the enemy. Machiavelli advises that this act should be achieved either by making him suspicious of his men in whom he trusted, or by giving him cause that he has to separate his forces, and, because of this, become weaker.

The maxim divide et impera has been attributed to Philip II of Macedon. It was utilised by the Roman ruler Julius Caesar and the French emperor Napoleon (together with the maxim divide ut regnes).

The strategy, but not the phrase, applies in many ancient cases: the example of Aulus Gabinius exists, parting the Jewish nation into five conventions, reported by Flavius Josephus in Book I, 169–170 of The Jewish War (De bello Judaico).Strabo also reports in Geographica, 8.7.3 that the Achaean League was gradually dissolved when it became part of the Roman province of Macedonia, as the Romans treated the various states differently, wishing to preserve some and to destroy others.[citation needed]

The strategy of division and rule has been attributed to sovereigns, ranging from Louis XI of France to the House of Habsburg. Edward Coke denounces it in Chapter I of the Fourth Part of the Institutes of the Lawes of England, reporting that when it was demanded by the Lords and Commons what might be a principal motive for them to have good success in Parliament, it was answered: "Eritis insuperabiles, si fueritis inseparabiles. Explosum est illud diverbium:

Answered by vaibhavhalingali777
3

Explanation:

in fact the divide and rule policy implimented

after the 1857 sepoy mutiny. in this mutiny Hindus and Muslims fought together. Britishers thought that it will become more dangerous. hence they made one policy that is divide and rule .

Britishers did many non- communal things to made a difference between Hindus and muslims.the outcome is as expected as Britishers thought.aftet this many communal riots started to happen.

Similar questions