What was experience of professor gaitonde in Azad maidan ? This question also chapter the adventure
Answers
Answered by
0
The police’s handling of the disturbance engineered by a small group of Muslim zealots on August 11 outside Azad Maidan calls for a case study.
Students of police science will benefit greatly from this since there are many lessons to be learnt. It is fortunate that the end result was positive as the ‘inaction’ of the police shifted the balance of sympathy in their favour, putting the entire Muslim community on the defensive.
Any other ending might have led to a major communal conflagration. If that had happened, the miscreants would have achieved what I suspect they set out to do, probably at the behest of foreign or anti-national elements who want life to be disrupted in the financial capital of India
hope it helps
Students of police science will benefit greatly from this since there are many lessons to be learnt. It is fortunate that the end result was positive as the ‘inaction’ of the police shifted the balance of sympathy in their favour, putting the entire Muslim community on the defensive.
Any other ending might have led to a major communal conflagration. If that had happened, the miscreants would have achieved what I suspect they set out to do, probably at the behest of foreign or anti-national elements who want life to be disrupted in the financial capital of India
hope it helps
SweetGirl10:
hii
Answered by
0
The adventure by Jayant Narlikar is a very interesting story. The main theme taken is catastrophe theory.
Professor Gangadharpant Gaitonde was a famous public speaker and had presided over 999 public functions. He had decided to speak on history for his 1000th function. The battle of Panipat was the topic. The 999th appearance was a seminar on catastrophe theory. He had discussions on the topic with Rajendra Deshpande, an expert on the topic. Prof. Gaitonde had doubt about the subject matter and practicality of the theory which was clarified by Rajendra. That day professor had an accident and a truck had collided with his car. He found himself waking up in a hospital but the extremely different environment. The date was same but everything was different. While a doctor offered to drop him to his home, the professor found out different Poona, different roads. He found out that he was officially dead on that day. He decided to go to his son in Bombay. The doctor dropped him at the railway station. The buses were private, fast ticketing, different currency notes were surprising him. He had to take permit to take a train for Bombay. His co-passenger Khan Sahib informed he can take a train to Peshawar and he did not need a passport to travel in his own country. Upon reaching Bombay, he had no son there and then he decided to go to a library to find out himself. he read the history books written by himself and Bahusahebanchi Bakhar. The battle was won by the Marathas. He found a seminar there in Azad Maidan and remembered he had to speak in it. But he was rudely removed by the people from the stage. He woke up in torn clothes in the park next day, somehow reached Rajendra and narrated the whole thing. Rajendra informed him that he had felt the catastrophe theory himself!
Now, Jayant Narlikar wants to prove that the theory is possible to work. There can be a possibility of an existence of a parallel universe, a different world in which something happened the different way and how is the situation there. If we are too involved in "what ifs" we can practically experience catastrophe theory and see the parallel world or the consequences ourselves.
Read more on Brainly.in - https://brainly.in/question/1105300#readmore
Professor Gangadharpant Gaitonde was a famous public speaker and had presided over 999 public functions. He had decided to speak on history for his 1000th function. The battle of Panipat was the topic. The 999th appearance was a seminar on catastrophe theory. He had discussions on the topic with Rajendra Deshpande, an expert on the topic. Prof. Gaitonde had doubt about the subject matter and practicality of the theory which was clarified by Rajendra. That day professor had an accident and a truck had collided with his car. He found himself waking up in a hospital but the extremely different environment. The date was same but everything was different. While a doctor offered to drop him to his home, the professor found out different Poona, different roads. He found out that he was officially dead on that day. He decided to go to his son in Bombay. The doctor dropped him at the railway station. The buses were private, fast ticketing, different currency notes were surprising him. He had to take permit to take a train for Bombay. His co-passenger Khan Sahib informed he can take a train to Peshawar and he did not need a passport to travel in his own country. Upon reaching Bombay, he had no son there and then he decided to go to a library to find out himself. he read the history books written by himself and Bahusahebanchi Bakhar. The battle was won by the Marathas. He found a seminar there in Azad Maidan and remembered he had to speak in it. But he was rudely removed by the people from the stage. He woke up in torn clothes in the park next day, somehow reached Rajendra and narrated the whole thing. Rajendra informed him that he had felt the catastrophe theory himself!
Now, Jayant Narlikar wants to prove that the theory is possible to work. There can be a possibility of an existence of a parallel universe, a different world in which something happened the different way and how is the situation there. If we are too involved in "what ifs" we can practically experience catastrophe theory and see the parallel world or the consequences ourselves.
Read more on Brainly.in - https://brainly.in/question/1105300#readmore
My question what will experience in Azad maidan not catestrophy theory
Similar questions