Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?
1. Marbury v. Madison (1803) 2. Baker v. Carr (1961)
A) 1. Declared that Congress had implied powers to carry out their enumerated
powers
2. Established limits to Congress’s power under the commerce clause
B) 1. Led to more power for the Supreme Court to check the other branches
2. Led to the “one-person, one-vote” judicial doctrine
C) 1. Ruled that national laws were supreme to state laws
2. Decided that federal courts could intervene and decide redistricting cases
D) 1. Decided that the Supreme Court could declare laws unconstitutional
2. Ended gerrymandering across the United States
Answers
Answer:
D) 1. Decided that the Supreme Court could declare laws unconstitutional
2. Decided that federal courts could intervene and decide redistricting cases
Explanation:
From the above question,
They have given :
Marbury v. Madison (1803) - This was a landmark case in which the US Supreme Court first exercised its power of judicial review. The Court declared that a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, thereby establishing the principle that the Supreme Court has the power to declare federal laws unconstitutional.
This decision established the Court as a co-equal branch of government with the legislative and executive branches and gave the Court the power to limit the actions of the other branches.
Baker v. Carr (1961) - This was a landmark case in which the US Supreme Court dealt with the issue of redistricting. The Court held that federal courts could hear cases involving unequal representation in state legislative districts, also known as "gerrymandering." The Court's decision in this case established the principle of "one person, one vote," which means that each person's vote must carry equal weight.
This ruling has had a significant impact on electoral politics in the United States and has helped to prevent the manipulation of district lines for political advantage.
D) 1. Decided that the Supreme Court could declare laws unconstitutional
2. Decided that federal courts could intervene and decide redistricting cases
For more such related questions : https://brainly.in/question/54845385
#SPJ3