Geography, asked by suhasinigupta, 1 year ago

why agriculture do not support a the veld region?

Answers

Answered by Jeniyaa
1
By extension, the veld can be compared to the "boondock" or those places "beyond the black stump" in Australia. There is a sense in which it refers in essence to unimproved land (and is therefore not the equivalent of the English paddok) and does not include areas used both for pastoral activities and the planting of crops. These areas are referred to as fields. The word is less appropriate for land that is heavily forested, mountainous, or urban. The simplest explanation will be to say the word "veld" means "natural vegetation"; excluding vegetation like swamps and forests. It does include mountains with vegetation but not deserts or mountains without natural vegetation.

plzz marked as brainliest if you like...

suhasinigupta: but veld s are in South Africa
Answered by kunalwadhwani
1
By extension, the veld can be compared to the "boondock" or those places "beyond the black stump" in Australia. There is a sense in which it refers in essence to unimproved land (and is therefore not the equivalent of the English paddok) and does not include areas used both for pastoral activities and the planting of crops. These areas are referred to as fields. The word is less appropriate for land that is heavily forested, mountainous, or urban. The simplest explanation will be to say the word "veld" means "natural vegetation"; excluding vegetation like swamps and forests. It does include mountains with vegetation but not deserts or mountains without natural vegetation.

plzz marked as brainliest if you like...
Similar questions