Question

Why debroglie hypothesis is insignificant for macroscopic objects

Answer 1

Answer:

Thus, for macroscopic objects, mass is very large, thus wavelength is very small. ... 3. Thus, this hypothesis is insignificant in the case of macroscopic objects.

Explanation:

mark me as brainlist please

Answer 2

Answer:

The de Broglie hypothesis is insignificant for macroscopic objects because its wavelength is negligibly small

Explanation:

The de-Broglie hypothesis gives beautiful information about matter waves, that is it has dual nature

When the matter is moving with velocity sometimes it acts as a particle or a wave

According to the de-Broglie hypothesis, the wavelength is

λ =$h/p$

where Planck's constant $h=6.6*10^{-34}$

$p$- the momentum of the particle ($p=mv$)

For a macroscopic object, its mass is very high

when the denominator is high the wavelength will be very small

if the wavelength is small we can neglect the wave property

⇒

de Broglie hypothesis is significant for microscopic objects