Why did political leaders differ sharply over the question of separate electorates? ONE POINT BUT IN SMALL
Answers
Political leaders differed sharply over the question of separate electorates because of differences in opinion. While those supporting the cause of minorities and the dalits believed that only political empowerment would resolve their social backwardness, others like Gandhiji thought that separate electorates would further slow down the process of their integration into society. Also, it was feared that the system of separate electorates would gradually divide the country into numerous fragments because every community or class would then ask for separate representations.
hope this helps you.
pls mark as brainliest.
Explanation:
Political leaders differed sharply over the question of separate electorates because of differences in their opinion.
Many dalit leaders were keen on a different political solution to the problems of the community. They believed that only political empowerment would resolve their social backwardness whereas Gandhiji believed that separate electorates would further slow down the process of their integration into society.
The Muslim leaders on the other and asked for separate electorates to safeguard the political interests of the Muslims. In their opinion, the majority of the people were Hindus, and so in case of joint electorates, the Muslims would have little chance of winning the seats. As such, they would always be at the mercy of the Hindus.
The Congress leaders oSpposed the policy of the British Government in provoking different groups of people in demanding separate electorate. They knew well that it was the British Government's conspiracy to encourage different people to ask for separate electorates because such a policy would weaken the national movement, and prolong Britisher's stay in India. The Congress leaders were one and all in favour of joint electorates