Math, asked by SanyaKapatia, 1 year ago

why is 2100 not a leap year??

Answers

Answered by krithi2001143

Heya mate!!

Here's your answer!!

2100 is a leap year as the number 2100 is divisible by 4.

So your question is a little wrong.

But your question can be:

Why is 2101 not a leap year??

Here's the answer for the question.

2101 is not a leap year as the number 2101 is not divisible by 4.

Hope it helps you!!

Cheers (^^)(^^)

Mark it as Brainliest if it helps!!

#foreverJungkook

aashi1405: 4x5 = 20 how can 21 be divisible by 4??

SanyaKapatia: my question is not wrong

SanyaKapatia: i checked on google it was saying that 2100 is not a leap year

SanyaKapatia: sorry Krithi201143 your answer was not at all helpful

SanyaKapatia: lol

agrawaladarsh72: she is ryt its a leap year

SanyaKapatia: no its notttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

SanyaKapatia: Since 2100 is divisible by 100 it needs to be divisible by 400 as well in order to be a leap year, which it's not. The concept of leap year is needed because earth completes one revolution in 365.2425 days ( not 365 days or 365.25 days ). So one day is added every four years to compensate for the extra time.

aashi1405: 2100 is not a leap a year

aashi1405: i answered this question but some idiot deleted it bcos she thought that 2100 is a leap year..it's not

Answered by reshmasri246

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2100 or 2200 be leap years. The correction to the Julian Calendar then in use was made by Act of Parliament 24 George II (1751) c.23 to align the calendar with that 'generally practised by almost all other Nations of Europe'. This (Gregorian) calendar was published by Pope Gregory XIII as a Papal Bull "Inter Gravissimus" in 1582, but it took some time for its use to become established. The change was made to avoid the gradual drift of the seasons, notably the Vernal Equinox on which the date of Easter depended, earlier in the year

SanyaKapatia: i know it is copied

SanyaKapatia: from the net

reshmasri246: is it help full

reshmasri246: ????????

reshmasri246: fine....

SanyaKapatia: not really

reshmasri246: oh ok fine

aashi1405: it's not a leap year

Previous Question

Next Question