why monarchial form of governmwnt is better than demoxratic
Answers
Answered by
3
For me, constitutional monarchy. Contrary to what some have asserted, a constitutional monarch does have political power, albeit very little. For example, the UK is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The monarch is expected to reign, not rule; Parliament does that. The UK also has an uncodified constitution whereby the country, quite literally, runs through convention and tradition. It is customary for the monarch to give royal assent to each bill to make it an act of parliament and thereby become law. The monarch does have some reserve powers but tends not to use these nowadays because some of the more controversial ones, such as vetoing a bill in Parliament and dissolving Parliament at will, would cause a constitutional crisis and Parliament could easily declare the throne vacant and repeal the Act of Settlement (1701).
Constitutional monarchies are excellent because:
They reduce corruption, unlike republics (think Trump, nepotism etc.) because rulers are likely to last longer in office as head of stateHead of state is an active role but they have very little political power and so they could not go against the democratic election process, unlike a president of the United States, through executive orders which bypass the democratic legislature, Congress
is it okkkay.......!!!!
raahul072:
is it then mark it as brainleast
Answered by
0
Hard to tell the difference between democracy and monarchy. Plenty of monarchies have had more turnover than our very own United States, where the Bush and Clinton clans have ruled uninterrupted for almost 20 years, and with the election of Hillary, will expand that to 24 or 28.
I think democracy is just monarchy with better public relations. Down through history, no matter what you call the government, it's usually the same folks who hold the power. Not always a bad thing, just something to admit to ourselves.
Well the way I see it monarchy can be good. Basicly you control the state and its well being. Although if a new rule were to be made, a vote from the people should be made. Hopefully there will be no need to cheat to get what the Monarch wants. Thats my fear, other wise a strong leader would be the priority. Democracy thats currently in place gets little done, but thats, maybe because of the other Non-whites hindering progress.
I think democracy is just monarchy with better public relations. Down through history, no matter what you call the government, it's usually the same folks who hold the power. Not always a bad thing, just something to admit to ourselves.
Well the way I see it monarchy can be good. Basicly you control the state and its well being. Although if a new rule were to be made, a vote from the people should be made. Hopefully there will be no need to cheat to get what the Monarch wants. Thats my fear, other wise a strong leader would be the priority. Democracy thats currently in place gets little done, but thats, maybe because of the other Non-whites hindering progress.
Similar questions
Social Sciences,
8 months ago
Math,
8 months ago
Math,
8 months ago
Math,
1 year ago
CBSE BOARD XII,
1 year ago
Biology,
1 year ago