why was reservation bill challenged in court what was the final judgement
Answers
Answered by
10
Indian Judiciary has pronounced some Judgments upholding reservations and some judgments for fine tuning its implementations. Lot of judgments regarding reservations have been modified subsequently by Indian parliament through constitutional amendments. Some judgments of Indian judiciary has been flouted by state and central Governments. Given below are the major judgments given by Indian courts and its implementation status
♥
♥
Answered by
2
Indian Judiciary has pronounced some Judgments upholding reservations and some judgments for fine tuning its implementations. Lot of judgments regarding reservations have been modified subsequently by Indian parliament through constitutional amendments. Some judgments of Indian judiciary has been flouted by state and central Governments. Given below are the major judgments given by Indian courts and its implementation status:[1][2]
1990: Syndicate Bank SC & ST Employees Association (Through its General Secretary Sh K S Badalia) & Others Vrs. Union of India & Others {1990 SCR(3) 713; 1990 SCC Supl. 350}: The Apex Court of the country held that reservation is applicable and available in selection method of promotions of Group-A/Class-1 Officers up to highest (Scale VII :General Manager) level and the Govt of India have committed mistake in not giving reservation to SC & ST Officers w.e.f. 01st January, 1978, the date from which the policy of reservation in Promotions was introduced/ implemented in Public Sector Banks. This judgment was implemented half heartedly only in Syndicate Bank up to April 1993. This historic and landmark judgment couldn't be implemented in other banks/Departments due to bad leadership in the SC & ST Employees Associations/ organizations of some banks like SBI, UCO Bank, Allahabad Bank, etc. because instead of getting this judgment implemented in their banks they, based on this judgment, filed Writ Petitions in Supreme Court and High Courts where they failed. To get this judgment implemented in all Banks, PSUs and Govt. Departments Mr. KS Badalia has struggled hard but he couldn't get any support from any Association, Organization and Political leader.
Relevant Cases
See Arts 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 335 of the Constitution of India.
State of Madras Vs. Smt. Champakam Dorairanjan AIR 1951 SC 226
General Manager, S. Rly v. Rangachari AIR 1962 SC 36
M R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649
T. Devadasan v Union AIR 1964 SC 179.
C. A. Rajendran v. Union of India AIR 1965 SC 507.
Chamaraja v Mysore AIR 1967 Mys 21
Barium Chemicals Ltd. Vs Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295
P. Rajendran Vs. State of Madras AIR 1968 SC 1012
Triloki Nath Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir AIR 1969 SC 1
State of Punjab vs. Hira Lal 1970(3) SCC 567
State of A.P. Vs U.S.V. Balram AIR 1972 SC 1375
Kesavanand Bharti v St of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461
State of Kerala Vs N. M. Thomas AIR 1976 SC 490 : (1976) 2 SCC 310
Jayasree Vs. State of Kerala AIR 1976 SC 2381
Minerva Mills Ltd Vs Union (1980) 3 SCC 625 : AIR 1980 SC 1789
Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib AIR 1981 SC 487
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh Vs Union (1981) 1 SCC 246
K. C. Vasant Kumar v. Karnataka AIR 1985 SC 1495
Comptroller & Auditor-General of India, Gian Prakash Vs K. S. Jaggannathan (1986) 2 SCC 679
Hope it helps you
Please make me as brainliest
1990: Syndicate Bank SC & ST Employees Association (Through its General Secretary Sh K S Badalia) & Others Vrs. Union of India & Others {1990 SCR(3) 713; 1990 SCC Supl. 350}: The Apex Court of the country held that reservation is applicable and available in selection method of promotions of Group-A/Class-1 Officers up to highest (Scale VII :General Manager) level and the Govt of India have committed mistake in not giving reservation to SC & ST Officers w.e.f. 01st January, 1978, the date from which the policy of reservation in Promotions was introduced/ implemented in Public Sector Banks. This judgment was implemented half heartedly only in Syndicate Bank up to April 1993. This historic and landmark judgment couldn't be implemented in other banks/Departments due to bad leadership in the SC & ST Employees Associations/ organizations of some banks like SBI, UCO Bank, Allahabad Bank, etc. because instead of getting this judgment implemented in their banks they, based on this judgment, filed Writ Petitions in Supreme Court and High Courts where they failed. To get this judgment implemented in all Banks, PSUs and Govt. Departments Mr. KS Badalia has struggled hard but he couldn't get any support from any Association, Organization and Political leader.
Relevant Cases
See Arts 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 335 of the Constitution of India.
State of Madras Vs. Smt. Champakam Dorairanjan AIR 1951 SC 226
General Manager, S. Rly v. Rangachari AIR 1962 SC 36
M R Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649
T. Devadasan v Union AIR 1964 SC 179.
C. A. Rajendran v. Union of India AIR 1965 SC 507.
Chamaraja v Mysore AIR 1967 Mys 21
Barium Chemicals Ltd. Vs Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295
P. Rajendran Vs. State of Madras AIR 1968 SC 1012
Triloki Nath Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir AIR 1969 SC 1
State of Punjab vs. Hira Lal 1970(3) SCC 567
State of A.P. Vs U.S.V. Balram AIR 1972 SC 1375
Kesavanand Bharti v St of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461
State of Kerala Vs N. M. Thomas AIR 1976 SC 490 : (1976) 2 SCC 310
Jayasree Vs. State of Kerala AIR 1976 SC 2381
Minerva Mills Ltd Vs Union (1980) 3 SCC 625 : AIR 1980 SC 1789
Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib AIR 1981 SC 487
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh Vs Union (1981) 1 SCC 246
K. C. Vasant Kumar v. Karnataka AIR 1985 SC 1495
Comptroller & Auditor-General of India, Gian Prakash Vs K. S. Jaggannathan (1986) 2 SCC 679
Hope it helps you
Please make me as brainliest
Similar questions