Question

write a debate on topic .
(for and against the motion both separately.)
Topic-
A presidential form of government would be better than the current parliamentary system
no spamming plzz.
please answer only those who know.
urgently required

Answer 1

Heyy ...here is your answer ^_^______^_^



1) First of all, I am against the parliamentary system because it grossly violates the basic principle of democracy – that is “for the people, from the people by the people”. As a result, in our country political parties have been mushrooming in the last 66 years, this trend automatically puts an obstacle for having proper governance. On the other hand, these parties make adverse effect on the governance. Therefore I think, we have to adopt the presidential system just like in the USA, ruling and opposing.


2) Secondly, in my opinion, a democratic system cannot survive if its foundation is having *religious* cracks and therefore there should not any concession based on any *religious factor* in the national and provincial governance. Every rule, law, act in the governance must be based on natural science. As a retired science teacher, let me state one important fact. For Nature, every child by birth is a *Homo sapiens* and Nature records death of a person as death of a Homo sapiens – not as a Hindu or a Muslim or a Christian. And hence I firmly believe that concession based on *religion* must stopped.


I hope this helps u !!! ^_^ ^_^

<_>plzzz<_>

◆_◆ mark my answer as brainliest ●_●

Answer 2

Answer:

The presidential system is better for democracy than the parliamentary one because of its separation of powers, the role of the judiciary, and government accountability to its people. ... In a presidential system, the courts have the power of judicial review, that is they can determine a law unconstitutional.