write an essay on the given attachment.
Answers
Answer:
Once upon a time in India there was a king named Ashoka.He was very kind and generous.once He want to jungle for hunting deer.He and is minister was hunting.Then suddenly a lion came. And the lion attack to the minister.Then the minister shouted help help without wasting time the king came and killed the lion.Then the minister said why u help me if u were die who will take care of your country.Then the king replied it is my duty to protect my people.from this we can know that the king was kind n generous
Explanation:
Once upon a time there was a king who loved himself to distraction morning, noon and night – 24/7 as they say these days – seven days a week, 365 days a year. He preferred leap years because he gained an extra day for self-adulation. To be a narcissist is no mean task, it takes a lot of hard work, and he justifiably gained the reputation of being an immensely hard-working ruler.
Somehow Raja sahebhad convinced everybody that his act of self-love was an austere act of fakiree –asceticism – that he was undertaking for his subjects. Despite the fact that he was unencumbered by what one would call an emotional life, he managed to convey to them that his very existence was for them – he was that good a communicator.
The king had an unerring knack for zeroing in on the deep anxieties of his subjects and dovetailing them with ‘larger’ issues of loyalty to the kingdom – in other words, him. At the same time he directed the subjects’ attention towards other aspirants to the throne, declaring that they were entirely responsible for the subjects’ woes. He ensured that the pretenders who roamed around sulkily could never touch him. As he periodically told his subjects, he was them and they were him.
In return, many of his subjects made him the object of their adoration. They saw him as he saw himself – an epochal man who stood head and shoulders above everybody else. People refused to believe that he was a ruthless ruler who did not trust anyone; who had no qualms about neutralising anyone who might ask even the most innocuous question or make some casual remark. Since everything was about him, it stood to reason that every comment, remark alluded to him
mark my answer as the brainliest