Political Science, asked by radhesham6223, 1 year ago

the arguments put forward against the all india services include;1. they restrict the autonomy and patronage of the states.2. they involve in the larger expenditure on the state governments.3. they do not facilitate interchange of experience.4. their members are not familiar with the language and culture of the concerned states.codes

Answers

Answered by Raiyyan03
0
(1) The direct recruits to All India Services work away from their home-states and bring objec­tivity and impartiality to their jobs.

(2) They serve the Central as well as the state governments. While working at the Centre they gain grass roots experience of the district and while working at the state they take a wider view of reality, redesign state policy in tune with national needs.

(3) Their national perspective and interaction with international institutions facilitate a wider perspective and improves the quality of policy and decisional systems.

(4) During Presidential Rule in the states these officers act as representatives of Union govern­ments and smoothen the transition.

(5) Their intellectual calibre is substantially high and coming from varied educational backgrounds, they bring in elements of rationality and innovation into the conduct of official business.

(6) These services build bridges between those two integral levels of the federal system.

(7) These services cherish a national vision and perspective and are important bulwarks against parochial and regional thinking. The members of these services act as instruments of national integration.

(8) The constitutional safeguards of security of service enable the officers of All India Services to give independent advice to their state political leaders.

hope it will help you

please mark as Brainliest
Similar questions