what is conclusion for gupta empires
Answers
n conclusion I believe the Mauryan and Gupta periods are seen as the height of early Indian civilizations mainly due to the fact that they were ruled by Indian ruler. Their position preceding and directly after the dark ages serves to highlight this point due to the foreign invasions. However I also believe it is not correct to extend the term dark ages further beyond dealing with the rulers in this period. This is because the so called dark ages saw India become a cultural melting pot and extensive trade routes being established. However despite of the cultural significance of the dark ages, the lack of an India ruler means that the Gupta and Muaryan empires will always be seen as the height of early Indian civilization as India was unified under a domestic ruler.Bibliography.Kulke and Rothermund.
Answer:
The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire existing from the mid-to-late 3rd century CE to 543 CE. At its zenith, from approximately 319 to 467 CE, it covered much of the Indian subcontinent.[4] This period is considered as the Golden Age of India by some historians.[5][note 1] The ruling dynasty of the empire was founded by the king Sri Gupta; the most notable rulers of the dynasty were Chandragupta I, Samudragupta, and Chandragupta II alias Vikramaditya. The 5th-century CE Sanskrit poet Kalidasa credits the Guptas with having conquered about twenty-one kingdoms, both in and outside India, including the kingdoms of Parasikas, the Hunas, the Kambojas, tribes located in the west and east Oxus valleys, the Kinnaras, Kiratas, and others